Docklands and the Thames,
Victoria Park to Paternoster
Square. Take a nostalgic
trip back to the East End in
the 1950’s or a stroll around
the Square Mile of the City
of London. It’s all here at
barryoneoff.co.uk
Copyright 2002 - 2023 ©Barry Carter. All rights reserved
THE GREAT FIRE OF LONDON 1666
Ashes to ashes
London has had many serious fires during
the course of it's lifetime. The earliest of
which we have definite knowledge occurred
in 60 AD, during the revolt led by Queen
Boudica, who completely destroyed Roman
Londinium. This fire was so fierce that
archaeologists
still use the layer
of ash left by the
flames to date the
strata below the
city during excavation work.
Another fire broke out in 675, destroying the
Saxon cathedral, which was built of wood. It
was rebuilt with stone around 675-685. In
1087, during the reign of William Rufus.
Much of the Norman city including Saint
Paul's Cathedral (there have been four) was
destroyed. Many other fires have been
recorded, the largest killing 3000 people in
1212, but none had caused so much
devastation to the City as the 1666 fire
although luckily there were few human
casualties this time.
The King’s Baker
It started on a windy Sunday night in a city
ravaged by the plague, on September 2nd
1666. In the premises belonging to Thomas
Faryner, the King's baker on Pudding Lane.
One of the ovens is left burning. A small fire
breaks out and spreads through the
premises. The flames quickly reach the
outside. Soon,
aided by the wind,
the whole building
is blazing. Embers
from the fire are
caught by the
strong breeze and deposited onto other
buildings, which in turn caught fire.
The buildings of the time were tightly packed.
Every piece of available land had some
structure on it and these structures had more
structures added to gain space above the
streets.. It was not long before the flames
were spreading at an alarming rate. The
danger had been seen years before and an
order issued by the governing bodies of the
city, that only stone structures be erected
with slate to be used as roofing material. Due
to the expense of these materials, the order
had been largely ignored and the use of tar
and timber was the usual thing. This of
course, aided the fire, and in conjunction with
the wind soon had the whole of the city
ablaze.
London razed to the
ground
It was to take four days to bring the blaze
under control. This was eventually
accomplished by demolishing buildings in it's
path with explosives to stop the spread of the
inferno. By this time it was too late. Only a
few structures remained with as much as
eighty per cent of the city just a pile of
smoking ruins. Amazingly enough, according
to some sources, there were no fatalities.
Another source says that the death toll
numbered eight. Which account is accurate I
cannot say, but either way, it is miraculous
that many hundreds were not killed by the
blaze.
The Lord Mayor’s Woe
The Lord Mayor at the time was Sir
Thomas Bludworth.
When he was informed
about the fire in it’s
early stages he looked
at it and is reputed to
have remarked “Why, a
maiden’s piss could put
it out”. If indeed he did utter those words he
couldn’t have been more mistaken about
the size of the human bladder! The very
next day he was found in a state of shock
pacing endlessly up and down muttering to
himself “What am I going to do, what am I
going to do”?
Samuel Pepys
Even the great diarist, Samuel Pepys, did
not see any cause for alarm when his
attention was drawn to the blaze. An
excerpt from his entry for that day reads:
“Some of our maids sitting up late last night
to get things ready against our feast today,
Jane called up about three in the morning,
to tell us of a great fire they saw in the City.
So I rose, and slipped on my nightgown
and went to her window, and thought it to
be on the back side of Mark Lane at the
farthest; but, being unused to such fires as
followed, I thought it far enough off, and so
went to bed again, and to sleep.”
Pepys had plenty more to write about the
inferno in the days that
followed.
The London Gazette, a
weekly newspaper of the
time, also had much to
report on the subject. The
first two pages of this issue
were devoted to the fire.
London Gazette report >>
Report by John Evelyn >>
The after effects
The social and economic problems created
by the disaster were overwhelming.
Evacuation from London and resettlement
elsewhere were strongly encouraged by
Charles II, who feared a London rebellion
amongst the dispossessed refugees.
Despite numerous radical proposals
London was reconstructed on essentially
the same street plan used before the fire.
This was mainly due to building and
business owners starting to construct new
premises on their old sites rather than wait
for official decisions.
Nobody was willing to wait. Twenty two 'Fire
Judges' were appointed to settle land
disputes amid the confusion but people
were in a hurry and carried on building.
This is why there were so many narrow
winding streets in the city. Building after
WWII changed the layout greatly and more
modern construction works of the present
day are gradually altering the old City plan.
Sir Christopher Wren
Sir Christopher Wren
was not originally an
architect. He was a
scientist,
mathematician,
inventor and founder
member of the Royal
Society. While in his
early thirties he had
taken an interest in the design and
construction of buildings and thought he
would like to try his hand. He put his
mathematical knowledge to good use when
making his architectural designs. Due to
having the advantage of having an uncle in a
position of high authority he was able to get
his name put forward for the designing of
several buildings outside London. These
including the Sheldonian Theatre in Oxford
and the Pembroke College Chapel,
Cambridge. This put him in good stead when
other contracts were being handed out.
He, with much input from Robert Hooke,
designed the Monument to the great fire,
which can still be seen on Fish Street Hill in
the City. It measures 202 feet high. This is
also the distance from where it stands, to
where the fire started. His first design was to
have had a statue of the King atop of it. Not
wishing to be
remembered along with
the disaster, the King
had this changed and
the golden flames were
used instead, as you
can still see today.
Rebuilding the City
Eighty percent of the City was ravaged by
the fire. Immediate action was needed to get
rebuilding under way, a massive task. Within
days of the fire Christopher Wren (and
others), had submitted designs to the King
for the complete rebuilding of the city. The
drawings showed a uniform geometric layout
with wide straight main streets and the
smaller streets branching off at right angles
with square blocks of buildings. This plan
could have been based on the layout of
Paris. Wren's only trip abroad in 1665 took
him there. The expense, if this plan had
been put into operation, would have been
enormous, and it was duly refused. Instead,
Wren got the go ahead to work on plans for
the churches. eighty nine of these had been
destroyed in the fire, and most of the ones
we see standing today were built to the
designs of Sir
Christopher
Wren’s office. His
most famous
ecclesiastical
landmark being
Saint Paul’s
Cathedral, with
it's huge
unsupported
dome.
London’s Burning, London’s Burning,
fetch the engines, fetch the engines,
Fire fire, Fire Fire,
Pour on water, pour on water.
Old nursery rhyme